Joint contact loading in forefoot and rearfoot strike patterns during running.

نویسندگان

  • Brandon D Rooney
  • Timothy R Derrick
چکیده

Research concerning forefoot strike pattern (FFS) versus rearfoot strike pattern (RFS) running has focused on the ground reaction force even though internal joint contact forces are a more direct measure of the loads responsible for injury. The main purpose of this study was to determine the internal loading of the joints for each strike pattern. A secondary purpose was to determine if converted FFS and RFS runners can adequately represent habitual runners with regards to the internal joint loading. Using inverse dynamics to calculate the net joint moments and reaction forces and optimization techniques to estimate muscle forces, we determined the axial compressive loading at the ankle, knee, and hip. Subjects consisted of 15 habitual FFS and 15 habitual RFS competitive runners. Each subject ran at a preferred running velocity with their habitual strike pattern and then converted to the opposite strike pattern. Plantar flexor muscle forces and net ankle joint moments were greater in the FFS running compared to the RFS running during the first half of the stance phase. The average contact forces during this period increased by 41.7% at the ankle and 14.4% at the knee joint during FFS running. Peak ankle joint contact force was 1.5 body weights greater during FFS running (p<0.05). There was no evidence to support a difference between habitual and converted running for joint contact forces. The increased loading at the ankle joint for FFS is an area of concern for individuals considering altering their foot strike pattern.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Biomechanical Differences of Foot-Strike Patterns During Running: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN Systematic review with meta-analysis. OBJECTIVES To determine the biomechanical differences between foot-strike patterns used when running. BACKGROUND Strike patterns during running have received attention in the recent literature due to their potential mechanical differences and associated injury risks. METHODS Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, SciELO, and SPORT...

متن کامل

The Effects of Changing Footstrike Pattern on the Amplitude and Frequency Spectrum of Ground Reaction Forces During Running in Individuals With Pronated Feet

Background: The current study aimed to evaluate the effects of barefoot and shod running with two different styles on ground reaction force-frequency content in recreational runners with low arched feet. Methods: The statistical sample of this research was 13 males with PF (mean±SD age: 26.2±2.8 y; height: 176.1±8.4 cm; weight: 78.3±14.3 kg). A force plate (Bertec, USA) with a sample rate of 1...

متن کامل

Ground Reaction Force Variables as Predictors of Lower Extremity Shock in Forefoot and Rearfoot Strike Patterns

Ground reaction force (GRF) parameters have been used to predict tibial shock in rearfoot strike patterns (Hennig & Lafortune, 1991). However, forefoot strike (FFS) runners have significantly different GRF parameters when compared to rearfoot strike (RFS) runners (Williams, D.S., et al., in press). A typical FFS running pattern results in significantly lower vertical GRF loading rates (ZLR) and...

متن کامل

Differences between Fore- and Rearfoot Strike Running Patterns Based on Kinetics and Kinematics

Some sports physicians and coaches are adamant, that forefoot striking (FFS) compared to rearfoot striking (RFS) results in a reduction of joint loading and therefore reducing the incidence of overuse injuries. The present study investigates the influence of different running strike patterns on knee joint loading and on “conventional” dynamic variables, which have been proposed as major reasons...

متن کامل

Do Impacts Cause Running Injuries? a Prospective Investigation

During running, the foot collides with the ground approximately 1000 times per mile. These collisions vary significantly by the strike pattern that the runner adopts. A rearfoot strike pattern results in a very distinct vertical impact peak that is missing in a midfoot or forefoot strike landing (Figure 1) [1]. The impact peak of a rearfoot strike is associated with higher rates of loading comp...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of biomechanics

دوره 46 13  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013